Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Barnard v. City of Poteau, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Greg Barnard
Defendant:
City of Poteau, Oklahoma and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copeland v. El Reno City of et al
as 5:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dwain Copeland
Defendant:
El Reno City of, Paul Broyles, Jay K Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tahermandarjani v. Edmond City of et al
as 5:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Spencer Tahermandarjani
Defendant:
Edmond City of, JOHN DOE, 1 and JOHN DOE, 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Baylor v. Unknown Officers et al
as 5:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gary Baylor
Defendant:
Unknown Officers, Oklahoma City Police Department, Larry Withrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waters et al v. City of Altus, Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Bradley Waters and Bryan Waters
Defendant:
City of Altus, Oklahoma, Does ## 1-5, Roger Levick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clyden v. Irwin et al
as 5:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Justuce Clyden
Defendant:
Grant Irwin, Jr, Irwin Auto Co and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ewell et al v. Clark et al
as 6:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Neville Ewell, II, Donta Davis and Samuel Washington
Defendant:
Shannon Clark, Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority, Lino Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
