Cases 11 - 20 of 27
McDaniel v. United States Department of Justice, et al.
as 2:2015cv01664
Plaintiff:
Tanya Grace McDaniel
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Davis Police Department, David Pendrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. City of Davis Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv02984
Plaintiff:
Lasonja Porter
Defendant:
City of Davis Police Department, Landy Black, Darren Pytel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. The United States, et al
as 2:2014cv02213
Plaintiff:
Tanya McDaniel
Defendant:
The United States, City of Davis, California, City of Davis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Powell, et al.
as 2:2013cv02653
Plaintiff:
Tanya McDaniel
Defendant:
Daniel Powell, John Vilnau and City of Davis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Ellis et al
as 2:2013cv01016
Plaintiff:
Derek Todd
Defendant:
John Ellis, Cyndy Pymm, Solano County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Derek Todd v. Keirith Briesenick, et al
as 12-16585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
KEIRITH BRIESENICK, PAUL DOROSHOV, DAVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Todd v. Briesenick et al
as 2:2012cv00856
Plaintiff:
Derek Todd
Defendant:
Keirith Briesenick, Paul Doroshov, Davis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. UC Davis Police Department
as 2:2011cv02979
Plaintiff:
Gregory B James
Defendant:
UC Davis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John O'Leary v. Lothallah Halimi, et al
as 11-16968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN O'LEARY
Defendant - Appellee:
LOTHALLAH HALIMI, CITY OF DAVIS, DAVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Jones v. Chiang et al
as 0:2011cv60763
Plaintiff:
Andrew Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Bruce Chiang, Chad Bishop, Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
