Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00783
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Knight v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Knight and Betty L Knight
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Mark Nooth, Judy Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans With Disabilities Act
Banks, Sr. v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Dr. Willie Banks, Sr.
Defendant:
District Attorney Kevin Deemer, Governor John Kitzhaber, Judge Jean Maurer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fager v County of Jackson, et al
as 1:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Brandy Fager
Defendant:
County of Jackson, State of Oregon Department of Corrections and CONMED, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
