Cases 11 - 20 of 66
SADDY v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS et al
as 3:2018cv16137
Defendant:
THOMAS BOYD, JOHN DOES 1-10, AGNES POLHEMUS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. SADDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEFILIPPO v. ALMEIDA
as 2:2017cv13026
Plaintiff:
VINCENT J DEFILIPPO
Defendant:
ANDRE J ALMEIDA, JOHN & JANE DOES 1-10 and JOHN & JANE DOES 11-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C.M.D. et al v. BRIDGEWAY REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv08375
Plaintiff:
C.M.D. , RICHARD P. DOURIS and CARMELA M. DOURIS
Defendant:
BRIDGEWAY REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC., PROGRAM FOR ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT, PAULA TOWLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SYKES et al v. JOHNS et al
as 1:2017cv07272
Defendant:
ANDREW B JOHNS , DAVID WEINSTEIN , CRAIG REINER and others
Plaintiff:
GERALD SYKES and MARGOT SYKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PANELLA v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 3:2017cv06487
Plaintiff:
JAMES PANELLA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PATROL, ORLANDO CRUZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZISA v. HAVILAND et al
as 2:2017cv05551
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KEN ZISA
Defendant:
JOHN HAVILAND , TIMOTHY CONDON , ZAIDA MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRUNKEL v. COUNTY OF BERGEN et al
as 2:2017cv05154
Plaintiff:
STEVEN PRUNKEL
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BERGEN, MICHAEL SAUDINO, M. GRANATA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINDSEY v. CITY OF PLAINFIELD, ET AL.
as 2:2016cv04854
Plaintiff:
JONITHAN LINDSEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PLAINFIELD, NEW JERSEY, REGGIE JOHNSON, O'BRIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BOROUGH OF TUCKERTON et al
as 3:2015cv08893
Plaintiff:
WENDY TUCKER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF TUCKERTON, MICHAEL CAPUTO, JUSTIN M. CHERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
