Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Cesal v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Craig J. Cesal
Defendant:
Federal Prison Industries, Inc. and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Simon v. Danny Bickell, et al
as 10-5313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Simon
Defendant - Appellee:
Danny Bickell, Wynne Patrick Kelly, Assistant United States Attorney, Federal Prison Industries Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMON vs. BICKELL et al
as 1:2009cv01983
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SIMON
Defendant:
DANNY BICKELL, JEFF ATKINS, WYNNE P. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Simon v. Jane Doe and John Doe et al
as 1:2009cv04541
Plaintiff:
Charles Simon
Defendant:
Jane Doe and John Doe, Danny Bickell, Jeff Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Simon v. Bickell et al
as 1:2009cv04350
Plaintiff:
Charles Simon
Defendant:
Danny Bickell, Jeff Atkins, Wynne P. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Simon v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00065
Plaintiff:
Charles Simon
Defendant:
Federal Prison Industries, Inc., Steve Shcwalb, Karolyn D. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
SIMON v. FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC., et al
as 1:2007cv00292
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SIMON
Defendant:
FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC., STEVE SHCWALB, KAROLYN D. ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
