Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Gordon v. City of Campbell et al
as 4:2021cv00299
Defendant:
The City of Campbell, Patrick P. Cunning doing business as Judge and City of Campbell
Plaintiff:
Deme Gordon doing business as Deme Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovette v. Mt. Healthy Zoning Commissions et al
as 1:2020cv00635
Defendant:
Bill Knight, Gordon Wong and Mt. Healthy Zoning Commissions
Plaintiff:
Jacque Lovette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Franklin County, Ohio et al.
as 3:2020cv00305
Defendant:
LPN Brooke N New-Berry, Marsha K Burgess, John Doe Employees #1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Gwen Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00329
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Kluchin et al v. City of Beachwood, et al
as 1:2018cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael Levin and James Kluchin
Defendant:
Merle Gordon, Michael Anderson, Gary Haba and others
Debtor:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Rezvannejad et al
as 1:2018cv00690
Plaintiff:
Victor Wilson
Defendant:
P.O. Jonathan Gordon, Ferooz Rezvannejad, City Of Cincinnati and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Merlitti v. University of Akron et al
as 5:2018cv00253
Plaintiff:
Tonya Merlitti
Defendant:
University of Akron, Greenleaf Family Center , Angela M. Richmond-Rossiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Ellis et al
as 1:2017cv00837
Plaintiff:
Michael Durham
Defendant:
Gordon Ellis , Board of County Commissioners Brown County , James Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
