Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Chen et al v. Grays Harbor County et al
as 3:2018cv05204
Plaintiff:
Qi Wen Chen , Edison Zheng , Yu Kin Zheng and others
Defendant:
Grays Harbor County and Grays Harbor County Drug Task Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Terwilleger v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2017cv05596
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Terwilleger
Defendant:
State of Washington and Grays Harbor County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terwilleger v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2017cv05580
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Terwilleger
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Assigned Counsel and Grays Harbor County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Grays Harbor County et al
as 3:2017cv05186
Plaintiff:
Theresa Doe
Defendant:
Grays Harbor County , Gerald Murphy , Greg Reynvaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv06039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schrotberger v. Grays Harbor County et al
as 3:2015cv05949
Plaintiff:
Bryan Schrotberger
Defendant:
Grays Harbor County , Grays Harbor Sheriff's Department , Richard Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henry v. Atoch et al
as 3:2011cv05740
Plaintiff:
William F. Henry
Defendant:
Brandon Atoch , City of Oakville , Grays Harbor County and others
Counter_claimant:
City of Oakville
Counter_defendant:
William F. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Searls v. Grays Harbor County et al
as 3:2011cv05673
Plaintiff:
Marcus R Searls
Defendant:
Grays Harbor County, Oakville City of , Elma City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
