Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Sistrunk v. City of Green Bay et al
as 1:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Clydel Sistrunk
Defendant:
City of Green Bay and Bashir Buruin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snelson, Carrie v. Mendota Mental Health Institute et al
as 3:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Carrie Snelson and Carrie Marie Lange
Defendant:
Mendota Mental Health Institute and Green County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skenandore v. Green Bay Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00834
Plaintiff:
Marvin Eastman Skenandore
Defendant:
Green Bay Police Department and Lt Buchmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N., M. v. Monona Grove School District et al
as 3:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
M. N.
Defendant:
Monona Grove School District, Molly Rilling, Tanya Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Green, Leslie v. Wipperfurth, Richard
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Leslie Green
Defendant:
Richard Wipperfurth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
Wilke v. Green Bay Parking Department et al
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kevin L Wilke
Defendant:
Green Bay Parking Department, Green Bay Police Department, City of Green Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matt v. City of Green Bay et al
as 1:2021cv00439
Defendant:
City of Green Bay and Timothy Fuerst
Plaintiff:
Brian Matt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sechrist v. City of Green Bay et al
as 1:2021cv00440
Defendant:
City of Green Bay and Scott M Salzmann
Plaintiff:
Richard Sechrist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
