Cases 11 - 20 of 197
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv21368
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv21056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
JONES et al v. RYAN et al
as 1:2023cv04557
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE CAPOBIANCO JONES, RHYS E. JONES, SR., M.D., RHYS E. JONES, JR. and others
Defendant:
AMANDA RYAN, DARYL HILL, JAMIE ANNE CHAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv20218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20218
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
MALEK v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv04344
Defendant:
SAFE HORIZON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, MATTHEW DUFFY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MALEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CERIGO et al v. MCKENNA et al
as 2:2023cv04311
Plaintiff:
THEO CERIGO and NANCY SMITH
Defendant:
CASSEY MCKENNA, GABRIEL MOREANO, EUGENE LUGTU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
