Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Ledger et al
as 1:2015cv02093
Plaintiff:
Monique Foster
Defendant:
Michael Ledger , Gary Harper and Steve Vida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harper v. Bank of America BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2015cv00373
Plaintiff:
Jerry Harper
Defendant:
Bank of America BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Cody Mahon, Brian T. Moynihan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Harper v. Bank of America BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2013cv01594
Plaintiff:
Jerry Harper
Defendant:
Bank of America BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Cody Mahon, Vicki Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harper et al v. City of Ironton, Ohio et al
as 1:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Beth Harper and Anthony E Daniels
Defendant:
City of Ironton, Ohio , B&B Holdings, PLLC , Oley Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Fifth District Court of Appeals et al
as 2:2011cv01116
Plaintiff:
Henry N. Harper
Defendant:
Fifth District Court of Appeals , W. Scott Gwin, P.J. , Sheila G. Farmer, J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Padden et al
as 2:2011cv01008
Plaintiff:
Henry N. Harper
Defendant:
Daniel G. Padden and Tribbie, Scott, Plummer & Padden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
