Cases 11 - 19 of 19
MAMMARO v. THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY ("DCP&P") et al
as 3:2013cv06483
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MAMMARO
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY ("DCP&P"), WATCHUNG POLICE DEPARTMENT, KARA P. WOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAHN v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv01874
Plaintiff:
PHILIP E. HAHN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY , THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, STUART RABNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAHI et al v. REFRIGERATED HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06297
Plaintiff:
HOSS DAHI and ELAINE DAHI
Defendant:
REFRIGERATED HOLDINGS, INC., GEMINI TRAFFIC SALES INC., EAST COAST WAREHOUSE & DISTRIBUTION CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWER v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 2:2010cv03204
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE et al v. THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC et al
as 2:2009cv05735
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE, SUSAN ROBINSON, ETTA ADAMS and others
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC and ANTHONY DENOVA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
