Cases 11 - 20 of 28
LUO v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2019cv00095
Defendant:
SHARON W. MONTANYE, SWEET STEVENS KATZ WILLIAMS LLP, GEOFFREY BALL and others
Plaintiff:
JENN-CHING LUO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUO v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2017cv01508
Plaintiff:
JENN-CHING LUO
Defendant:
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT and THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUO v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2016cv06568
Plaintiff:
JENN-CHING LUO
Defendant:
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, GEOFFREY BALL, SHARON W. MONTANYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LUO v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2015cv04248
Plaintiff:
JENN-CHING LUO
Defendant:
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, GEOFFREY BALL, BRIAN SCHNEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROY v. SUPREME COURT OF U.S. et al
as 2:2012cv04152
Plaintiff:
KAMAL K.K. ROY
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF U.S., J. ROBERT, B OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HARRIS v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2011cv01518
Plaintiff:
SKYLER HARRIS
Defendant:
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, OWEN J. ROBERTS HIGH SCHOOL, OWEN J. ROBERTS MIDDLE SCHOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Lloyd-Silber Prosthetics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Roberts
Defendant:
Lloyd-Silber Prosthetics, Inc. and Steven Yohe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
