Cases 11 - 20 of 310
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Miller v. Hartfield et al
as 3:2023cv03041
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Miller
Defendant:
Joshua Hartfield and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Preciado et al
as 3:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Hailey Taylor
Defendant:
Rick Preciado, Kaitlyn Yielding, Cherodrick Jeffries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rollins v. Kiffin et al
as 3:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
DeSanto Rollins
Defendant:
Lane Kiffin, University of Mississippi and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Evans v. City of Hazlehurst et al
as 3:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Sheila Evans
Defendant:
City of Hazlehurst, City of Hazlehurst Police Department and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Culumber v. Morris Network of Mississippi, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Toni Miles Culumber
Defendant:
Morris Network of Mississippi, Inc. doing business as WXXV-TV, Morris Multimedia, Morris Network, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
