Cases 11 - 20 of 69
WRIGHT v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2021cv13158
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, JOHN DOES 26-50 (fictitious names), OFFICER LUIS GONZALEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KALIEF v. CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv05729
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CCPD/DEA TASK FORCE, USMS CUSTODIAN OF SADF and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY KALIEF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00513
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DUNCAN v. CITY OF PATERSON, et al.
as 2:2020cv08471
Plaintiff:
Gen. Administrator Shaquana D. Duncan and SHAQUANA D. DUNCAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, Officer KYLE WANAMAKER, DR. JOSEPH AFFORTUNATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. TOWNSHIP OF CARNEY'S POINT et al
as 1:2020cv02397
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25, JOHN DOES 26-50, POLICE CHIEF GERALD KRIVDA and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. BOROUGH OF PENNS GROVE et al
as 1:2020cv01656
Defendant:
PATRICK RILEY, TOWNSHIP OF CARNEYS POINT, JOHN DOES 26-50 and others
Plaintiff:
TERRELL PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRUILL v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2019cv20963
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF ESSEX, ABC CORPS. 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT SPRUILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALVARADO v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv18574
Defendant:
Nate Pino, JOHN DOE 1-50, Curtis Catalano and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv16503
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv15852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
