Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Sharon T. v. New Directions Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04239
Defendant:
A Community of Friends, Does, John Stewart Company and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon T.
The John Stewart Company v. Jeremiah Leon et al
as 8:2015cv00392
Defendant:
DOES and Jeremiah Leon
Plaintiff:
The John Stewart Company
McInerney et al v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2011cv03018
Plaintiff:
Joseph McInerney
Defendant:
City of San Jose, City and County of San Francisco, The Tides Center, Dish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis v. The John Stewart Company
as 2:2010cv02003
Plaintiff:
Stafford B. Davis
Defendant:
The John Stewart Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Stewart v. Porterville et al
as 1:2010at00067
Plaintiff:
John Stewart, John Stewart and John Stewart
Defendant:
City of Porterville, Aaron Sutherland and Mark Azevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. City of Porterville, et al.
as 1:2010cv00199
Plaintiff:
John Stewart
Defendant:
City of Porterville, Aaron Sutherland and Mark Azevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kathy Schmidt et al v. Amcal Wood Ranch Fund XXXVII et al
as 2:2009cv00931
Plaintiff:
Kathy Schmidt, Kathy Schmidt, Ainslie Schmidt and others
Defendant:
Amcal Wood Ranch Fund XXXVII, John Stewart Company and Sharon Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Doe et al v. San Francisco Housing Authority et al
as 3:2008cv03112
Plaintiff:
Guy Montag Doe, Guy Montag Doe, Guy Montag Doe and others
Defendant:
San Francisco Housing Authority, Miriam Saenz, Henry Alvarez, III and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robison et al v. Amcal Wood Ranch Fund XXXVII et al
as 2:2007cv04862
Plaintiff:
Betty Robison, Betty Robison, Mary Austin and others
Defendant:
Amcal Wood Ranch Fund XXXVII, Amcal Multi-Housing, Inc., John Stewart Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
