Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Zuri AGiza v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv01920
Plaintiff:
Zuri AGiza
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Hospital, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Melissa Young
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The GEO Group, Inc, John or Jane Doe 1-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 v Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendments
Doe 1 et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv08412
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and DOES 2 through 40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07707
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05276
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Anderson et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2020cv00315
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Police Chief David Nisleit, City Council Member Scott Sherman and others
Plaintiff:
Karina Anderson and Lerajjarean Ra-o-kel-ly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06962
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Wynnycky v. Screen Actors Guild-American Fedration of Television and Radio Artists, Inc.
as 2:2018cv09703
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Wynnycky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01754
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02542
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
