Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Martinez v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2022cv05919
Plaintiff:
Karen Martinez
Defendant:
Pierce County, Kim DeMarco, Sandi Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wengeler v. King et al
as 2:2022cv01457
Plaintiff:
Carl Wengeler
Defendant:
Lauren J King, David G Estudillo, Richard Creatura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley-Zayas v. Robinson et al
as 3:2022cv05307
Plaintiff:
Marcel Bradley-Zayas
Defendant:
Denise Robinson, Karen Richholt, Katherine Diesch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Cera et al
as 3:2022cv05239
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Kim Wayman Cera, Tina Podlodowski, David Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Miller et al
as 3:2021cv05539
Plaintiff:
Brenda M Johnson
Defendant:
Law Librarian Amber Miller, Karen Lee, Heather Mustapha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2021cv00973
Plaintiff:
Beans & Rocks LLC
Defendant:
Pacific County, Karen Bannish and Materials Testing & Consulting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beans & Rocks LLC v. Pacific County et al
as 3:2021cv05528
Plaintiff:
Beans & Rocks LLC
Defendant:
Pacific County, Karen Bannish and Materials Testing & Consulting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
