Cases 11 - 20 of 83
PINCUS HUETER v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2021cv02342
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JAY PINCUS HUETER and TAO
Defendant:
DEBRA ANN HAALAND, AMERICAN SAMOA GOVERNMENT, LEMANU PALEPOI SIALEGA MAUGA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KM SPIRITUAL COLLECTIVE CONFEDERATION et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
MICHIGAN MOTHER MEDICINE CHURCH OF KM, TIMOTHY LOCKARD, AARON GIBBS and others
Defendant:
SEAN REYES, STATE OF OREGON, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. UNITED STATES CITY OF NEW YORK
as 1:2021cv00562
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES CITY OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff:
SYLFRONIA KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURU v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00486
Defendant:
MARK S. ZEMELMAN, H.R. OF SAINT JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION COLORADO and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LI et al v. SCALIA et al
as 1:2020cv01933
Plaintiff:
STACEY KING and LEI LI
Defendant:
EUGENE SCALIA, STEVE SISOLAK and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, TRAINING & REHABILITATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv00590
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
CLERMONT v. SOOTER et al
as 1:2019cv00314
Defendant:
JAKE FERRER, RICCARDO MARTINEZ, DEVIN COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
EMIL CLERMONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEATHER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv02267
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DARDZINSKI, LINDA LEATHER, WILLIAM KING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
