Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Bondick v. City of Eugene Police, et al.
as 6:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
Robert Bondick
Defendant:
City of Eugene Police, Lane County District Attorneys Office, Eugene City Prosecutors Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payne v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Anzhelika Payne
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Lane County, Jairo Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Brown v. Lane County et al
as 6:2021cv01866
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Lane County, Alfredo Velez, Nathan Gent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Flynn v. Sanders et al
as 6:2021cv01291
Plaintiff:
Kelsie Flynn
Defendant:
Logan Sanders, Saint Vincent DePaul of Eugene doing business as SVDP/SVDP, US, Comfort Inn Tridelphia, WV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bondick v. Lane County et al
as 6:2021cv01312
Plaintiff:
Robert Bondick
Defendant:
Lane County, City of Eugene, City of Eugene Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jackson et al v. Gill et al
as 6:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Richard Fredricks, Gregory Magnus, Incorporated City of Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Alexi Elias Ghenatos, Christina Chapman, Amanda Dupray-Raley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
