Cases 11 - 20 of 28
ARISTEO v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv00769
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, JODY RAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DANIELS v. CYNKIN et al
as 1:2013cv06027
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. DANIELS
Defendant:
LAURIE E. CYNKIN, ANDREW M. ROSENBERG, THE SUSAN J. SNYDER LIVING TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWTON et al v. MACFARLAND et al
as 1:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NEWTON , JOHN C. NEWTON and PATRICIA NEWTON
Defendant:
WADE MACFARLAND , GREENWICH TOWNSHIP , GREENWICH TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PUSHKIN v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES - SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY(SDSU) et al
as 2:2011cv01984
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. PUSHKIN, DR.
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES - SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY(SDSU), DAVID L. CHICOINE, LAURIE NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNLEAVY v. GANNON et al
as 2:2011cv00361
Plaintiff:
HARRY DUNLEAVY
Defendant:
EDWARD GANNON , ALAN HANDLER , JOHN TONELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2010cv01045
Plaintiff:
ANGELIQUE ROBINSON
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, MARIA MARQUEZ and LAURIE LYNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
