Civil Rights Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Buras v. Law Firm of Scott and Fenderson
as 1:2014cv00438
Plaintiff: Ricky M. Buras
Defendant: Law Firm of Scott and Fenderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace v. Quitman County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00255
Plaintiff: Jamarcus Wallace
Defendant: Quitman County, Mississippi, David L. Tisdell and Tisdell Law Office, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. CITI Mortgage, et al
as 5:2013cv00233
Plaintiff: Charles Young and Linda Young
Defendant: CITI Mortgage Inc., Gov. Federal Reserve Bank of N.Y., Board of Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Young v. CITI Mortgage, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00836
Plaintiff: Charles Young and Linda Young
Defendant: CITI Mortgage Inc., Gov. Federal Reserve Bank of N.Y., Board of Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bell et al v. Bolivar County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00141
Plaintiff: Aretha Bell , Lisa M. Daniels , Me'Unca Dukes and others
Defendant: Bolivar County, Mississippi, H.M. Mack Grimmett, Unknown Sheriff's Deputies of Bolivar County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Penny Pincher, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00578
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Penny Pincher, Inc. , Michael Law and Deanna Lynn Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Necaise v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2010cv00025
Plaintiff: Linda Necaise
Defendant: Shelia Dorris McDaniel, A. E. Rusty Harlow, Harlow And Harlow Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?