Civil Rights Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Holmes v. Frito-Lay Dip Company, Inc. as a Subsidiary of PepsiCo, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02053
Plaintiff: Jonathan Holmes
Defendant: Frito-Lay Dip Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lai v. New York City
as 1:2017cv01191
Plaintiff: Kenney Shi Lai
Defendant: New York City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosado v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv09695
Plaintiff: Yvonne Rosado
Defendant: The City of New York, Ruben Cuesta, John Doe Partner of P.O. Cuesta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv09352
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Wei et al, vs. Spears
as 7:2015cv08245
Plaintiff: Jia Wen Ashley Wei , Andrew Fung , Jefferson Lai and others
Defendant: Gary Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Wei et al
as 7:2015cv08243
Plaintiff: Jia Wen Ashley Wei , Andrew Fung, Jefferson Lai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Dudley v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04820
Defendant: City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, Police Officer Herman Lai and others
Plaintiff: Galvin Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00195
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01841
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01842
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?