Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Marlon Brooks v. Lee Lucas, et al
as 12-3889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE LUCAS, ROBERT CROSS, RICHLAND COUNTY and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEA AGENTS and UNKNOWN RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICERS
Arrico Spires v. Lee Lucas, et al
as 12-3882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARRICO SPIRES
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE LUCAS, ROBERT CROSS, RICHLAND COUNTY and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEA AGENTS and UNKNOWN RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICERS
Charles Matthews v. Lee Lucas, et al
as 12-3886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE LUCAS, ROBERT CROSS, RICHLAND COUNTY and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEA AGENTS and UNKNOWN RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICERS
Johnny Robertson v. Lee Lucas, et al
as 12-3877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE LUCAS, ROBERT CROSS, RICHLAND COUNTY and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEA AGENTS and UNKNOWN RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICERS
Noel Mott v. Lee Lucas, et al
as 11-3996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NOEL MOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE LUCAS, ROBERT CROSS, JOHN FERESTER and others
Noel Mott v. Lee Lucas, et al
as 11-3853
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NOEL MOTT
Defendant:
LEE LUCAS, et al.
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY FAITH and MATT MAYER
Noel Mott v. Lee Lucas, et al
as 11-3854
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NOEL MOTT
Defendant - Appellant:
LEE LUCAS
Defendant:
ROBERT CROSS, et al.
Noel Mott v. Lee Lucas, et al
as 11-3855
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NOEL MOTT
Defendant:
LEE LUCAS, et al.
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES METCALF
Jason Westerfield v. USA, et al
as 11-3607
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JASON WESTERFIELD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
Defendant - Appellant:
LEE LUCAS
Williams v. Lucas et al
as 1:2010cv00615
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Williams
Defendant:
Lee Lucas, Robert Cross, John Ferster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
