Cases 11 - 20 of 583
Medas-King v. Davson et al
as 1:2024cv01812
Plaintiff:
Andy Medas-King
Defendant:
Dr. Robin R. Davson, Lisa Hidalgo, Seth Rosenkratz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01522
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
The City of New York, District Attorney Alvin Bragg, Cyrus R. Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hammer v. Town of Bedford New York et al
as 7:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Melanie Hammer
Defendant:
Town of Bedford New York, Department of Building Bedford New York, Peter Michaelis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blaney et al v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
Mary Blaney and Frances Lombardi
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Town of Oyster Bay, Carnell T. Foskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
