Cases 11 - 20 of 64
MURPHY v. CROOME et al
as 5:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
YVONNE MURPHY
Defendant:
SANDERSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARYANN CROOME doing business as JEC PROPERTIES LLC and WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Broes v. Darraugh et al
as 1:2019cv02018
Defendant:
Shelly Broes, Aaron Boyce, Aleisha Rucker-Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Broes, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mitchell v. Mather et al
as 1:2018cv01961
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Mitchell, Willie Joe Mitchell, Jr. and Joshua Lee Carlisle Mitchell
Defendant:
John R. Mather, Myra H. Dixon, Susan Edlein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv01947
Plaintiff:
Debra Denise Curry
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Terry Baskin, Clayton Tax Commissioners Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Americans for Freedom of Kennesaw State University et al v. Harmon et al
as 1:2018cv00956
Plaintiff:
Young Americans for Freedom of Kennesaw State University and Zachary Bohannon
Defendant:
W. Ken Harmon , Andrew Newton , Kathleen C. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
