Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Roberts v. Norton et al
as 3:2017cv02547
Plaintiff:
Jamal Roosevelt Roberts
Defendant:
T. Norton and J. McKean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Apodaca et al v. Abrego et al
as 3:2017cv01014
Plaintiff:
Nathan Apodaca and Students for Life at California State University-San Marcos
Defendant:
Silas Abrego, Jane W. Carney, Adam Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials et al v. Torlakson et al
as 4:2017cv00635
Plaintiff:
California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials , Arvind Raghavan , Vishnukumar Thumati and others
Defendant:
Tom Torlakson , Tom Adams , Stephanie Gregson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv09277
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Norton v. Santa Rosa Police Department et al
as 4:2014cv04352
Plaintiff:
Bernard Norton, Jr.
Defendant:
Santa Rosa Police Department and City of Santa Rosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tew v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2013cv00608
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Tew
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation , Mr Wilson, Ohio Bureau of Workmens Compensation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Andy Alexander Menjivar v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv09551
Defendant:
Charlie Beck, Chief Charlie Beck, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Andy Alexander Menjivar
Jennifer Norton v. DHS et al
as 5:2012cv01088
Defendant:
CIA, DARPA, DHS and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Norton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02706
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
