Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
LAND v. PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv00758
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LAND
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP , SHAUN KOZAK , DAVID ZINNI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BOYER et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2013cv05715
Plaintiff:
AMIR BOYER , FAHEEM KENNEDY , NOGOMO RANSOME and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, MICHAEL SPICER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KENNEDY-CLARK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv04349
Plaintiff:
BRUCE KENNEDY-CLARK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PATRICK KELLY, MARK RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. Herman et al
as 1:2013cv01426
Plaintiff:
Eugene Douglas Manning
Defendant:
Douglas Herman, Thomas Corbett, Richard Alloway, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RANSOME v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
JERRY RANSOME
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, EDWARDS and SERRANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RANSOM v. UNITED STATE GOV. et al
as 2:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
ANTIONIO ANDRE RANSOM
Defendant:
UNITED STATE GOV., WILLIAM CLARK and DIONDRE KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
RANSOM v. (MICROSOFT) et al
as 2:2012cv03575
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO A. RANSOM
Defendant:
(MICROSOFT), WILLIAM CLARK, DIONDRE KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Kisenwether et al
as 3:2012cv00379
Plaintiff:
Ransom Young
Defendant:
Brian Kisenwether , Charles Altmiller and Butler Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
