Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Betzel et al v. Gallegos et al
as 1:2023cv02247
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Betzel, Ronald Reed, Sara Engimann and others
Defendant:
#14570 Angelo Gallegos, #17643 Michael Wilson, #13262 David Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Reed et al
as 3:2022cv50359
Plaintiff:
Mr. Anthony M Brown
Defendant:
Mr. Paul Reed, Officer Hruska, Waylon Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Clervrain v. McConchie et al
as 1:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain also known as Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu doing business as Brandako, Inc, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu, Manetirony Clervrain and others
Defendant:
Dan McConchie, Jim Durkin, Ronna McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed Jr. v. Shah et al
as 1:2021cv05954
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ritz and Lenn Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Vipin Shah and Faiyaz Ahmed
Respondent:
Lennisha Reed
Petitioner:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
