Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Burke v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 6:2018cv00257
Defendant:
Josh Girdner, Brandon Vick, Tahlequah, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Robbie Emery Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gist v. Wagoner County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Michael Gist
Defendant:
Jeff Halfacre, Does II through XX, John Denton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. County Commissioners of Mayes County et al
as 4:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Natasha Dodson
Defendant:
County Commissioners of Mayes County , Mike Reed , Gary Shrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrola v. Colbert, Town of et al
as 6:2017cv00473
Plaintiff:
Frank Burrola
Defendant:
Colbert, Town of, Roxanne Reed, Lewis Presley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00606
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee Wilkins
Defendant:
Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc., Oklahoma Sheriffs'Association, The, Jason Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crittenden v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 6:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
Briena Crittenden
Defendant:
Tahlequah, City of, Randy Tanner, Bronson McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dodson v. County Commissioners of Mayes County et al
as 4:2015cv00580
Plaintiff:
Natasha Dodson
Defendant:
County Commissioners of Mayes County , Mike Reed , Gary Shrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. City of Tulsa, The et al
as 4:2015cv00528
Plaintiff:
Michelle Dawn Murphy
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, Mike Cook, Timothy Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
