Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Randolph v. Glanz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00154
Plaintiff: Dakota Randolph
Defendant: Stanley Glanz , Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County , Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5014
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00016
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burke v. Glanz et al
as 4:2016cv00007
Plaintiff: Robbie Emery Burke
Defendant: Stanley Glanz, Robert C Bates, Michael Huckeby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrum v. Glanz et al
as 4:2016cv00006
Plaintiff: Terry Byrum
Defendant: Stanley Glanz, Robert C Bates and Richard Weigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsh v. Long et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00708
Plaintiff: Randall Marsh
Defendant: David Long and Stanley Glanz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aery v. Nuckolls We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00624
Plaintiff: Ashley Aery
Defendant: Gerald Nuckolls and Stanley Glanz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hearn v. Glanz et al
as 4:2015cv00549
Plaintiff: Angela Denise Hearn
Defendant: Stanley Glanz , Tulsa County Board of County Commissioners , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdwell v. Glanz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00304
Plaintiff: Scott W Birdwell
Defendant: Stanley Glanz, Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Unknown Nurse #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00678
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?