Cases 11 - 20 of 24
FERRY v. BARRY et al
as 1:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
GEORGE FERRY
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARRY and RICHARD SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SORRENTINO et al v. TOWN OF WESTFIELD et al
as 2:2011cv07412
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY SORRENTINO and LAWRENCE ROLNICK
Defendant:
TOWN OF WESTFIELD , WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT , PRESTON MANDEL-FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLNICK et al v. TOWN OF WESTFIELD et al
as 2:2011cv07414
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN ROLNICK and RAMON D. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
TOWN OF WESTFIELD , WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT , PRESTON MANDEL-FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv06481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
LAUTE et al v. THE CITY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2011cv03792
Plaintiff:
HARRY F. LAUTE and DENISE LAUTE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF GLOUCESTER , GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , JAMES LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2011cv01528
Plaintiff:
GEORGE C. JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LILLIS v. MOLONELLI et al
as 2:2010cv04090
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LILLIS
Defendant:
JOHN L. MOLONELLI, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC., THE BOROUGH OF CRESSKILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
