Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Mardoche Olivier v. J. Salcedo, et al
as 17-5244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. SALCEDO, Clarksville Police Officer, DAVID MOORE, Clarksville Police Officer and CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE
Mardoche Olivier v. City of Clarksville PoliceDept, et al
as 17-5242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY CHIEF GRAY, DARREN KOSKI and others
Mardoche Olivier v. City Of Clarksville, et al
as 17-5243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSVILLE and LIEUTENANT KOYAMA
Mardoche Olivier v. Auto Transport, et al
as 17-5055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARDOCHE OLIVIER
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTO TRANSPORT, LEIGH BLACK, CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE and others
Lozano v. City of Clarksville et al
as 3:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Troy A. Lozano
Defendant:
City of Clarksville and T. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Olivier v. City of Clarksville et al
as 3:2016cv03306
Plaintiff:
Mardoche Olivier
Defendant:
City of Clarksville and f/n/u Koyama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Olivier v. Salcedo et al
as 3:2016cv03284
Plaintiff:
Mardoche Olivier
Defendant:
J. Salcedo, David Moore and City of Clarksville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oliver v. City of Clarksville, Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv03287
Plaintiff:
Mardoche Oliver
Defendant:
City of Clarksville, Police Department, f/n/u Gray, Koski Darren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olivier v. McMillian et al
as 3:2016cv03288
Plaintiff:
Mardoche Olivier
Defendant:
Kim McMillian, Clarksville Police Department, Al Rivers Ansley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Olivier v. Auto Transport et al
as 3:2016cv03255
Plaintiff:
Mardoche Olivier
Defendant:
Auto Transport, Leigh Black, City of Clarksville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
