Cases 11 - 20 of 22
CARMICHAEL v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
OBIE CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVEZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00513
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHAVEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00495
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00496
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURPURA et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 3:2010cv04814
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS E. PURPURA and DONALD R. LASTER, JR.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEMBY v. PARRY et al
as 1:2010cv04379
Plaintiff:
RONALD DEMBY
Defendant:
KEVIN M. PARRY, JASON STETSER, OFFICER ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BREWER v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 2:2010cv03204
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITMAN v. OTTEHBERG et al
as 1:2010cv02538
Plaintiff:
PERMAN PITMAN
Defendant:
JOSHUA M. OTTEHBERG, JOHN DOES AND JANES DOES 1-10, HARRY COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv03779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
