Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Brewer v. University of Oklahoma Tulsa et al
as 4:2018cv00404
Defendant:
J Lee, University of Oklahoma Tulsa, Officer Weatherley and others
Plaintiff:
Gaye Lynn Dilek Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thody v. United States of America et al
as 6:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Walter Eliyah Thody
Defendant:
United States of America, Frank H. Seay, James H. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Collins et al v. Pelfrey et al
as 5:2017cv00393
Plaintiff:
Andria Collins and Maeisha Pennon
Defendant:
Walter Ray Pelfrey, Omega Enterprises LLC, Pelfrey Investments Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Metropolitan Fair Housing Council of Oklahoma Inc et al v. Pelfrey et al
as 5:2015cv01331
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Fair Housing Council of Oklahoma Inc , Raquel Hall-Hubbard , Darnell Jackson and others
Defendant:
Walter Ray Pelfrey, W Ray Pelfrey, Omega Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walters v. Walton et al
as 4:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
Terry Walters
Defendant:
Scott Walton , Jon Sappington , Dan Dozier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Department of Human Services et al
as 5:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Walter Jones
Defendant:
Department of Human Services and Linda Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
