Cases 11 - 20 of 182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Parker v. Barlow et al
as 3:2022cv01959
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert Roosevelt Parker, Jr and Robert R. Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
John L Barlow, Paula A Barran, John D Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ard v Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Marlin Ard
Defendant:
Hilary D Boyd, Oregon State Bar, Oregon State Bar Disciplinary Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrews v. City of Saint Helens et al
as 3:2022cv01128
Plaintiff:
Ashley D. Andrews
Defendant:
City of Saint Helens, Adam S. Raethke, Jamin W. Coy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marquart v. Cereghino et al
as 3:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Zachary Forrest Marquart
Defendant:
Richard J. Cereghino, Sandra L. Cereghino, Donald Ray Treanor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Hein et al
as 1:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith and James Darell Smith
Defendant:
James K. Hein, Transition Projects, Inc. (TPI) and Home Forward of Multnomah County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Butnaru v. Nomako
as 3:2021cv01894
Plaintiff:
Cristian Butnaru
Defendant:
Joseph Nomako and Joseph D. Nomako
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
