Civil Rights Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 11 - 20 of 35,092
Doe v. Northwestern University
as 1:2024cv04125
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Northwestern University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04108
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04111
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02376
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ortiz et al v. DCFS et al
as 1:2024cv04139
Plaintiff: Ana Ortiz, Anthony Ortiz and Antonio Bryant
Defendant: DCFS, Ruth Mejias, Theresa Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Beatty v. Legge et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01188
Plaintiff: Brandon J Beatty
Defendant: Katherine Legge, Stephanie Mitchell and Caitlyn Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Coleman v. Melcher et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff: Thomas Coleman
Defendant: Melcher and Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson, as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Richardson v. King et al
as 2:2024cv02113
Plaintiff: Amy Richardson, as Representative of the Estate of Jordan Richardson
Defendant: Jerry King and Village of Rantoul, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?