Cases 191 - 200 of 108,431
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Kohls v. Bonta et al
as 2:2024at01196
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and Shirley N. Weber
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kohls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kohls v. Bonta et al
as 2:2024cv02527
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and Shirley N. Weber
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kohls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adam Ghadiri v. JC Sheet Metal, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01999
Defendant:
JC SHEET METAL, INC., a California Corporation and CHOCOTECO, JOSE LUIS TR J L CHOCOTECO LIVING TR, a trust
Plaintiff:
ADAM GHADIRI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Noho Diagnostic Center, Inc. et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv07952
Plaintiff:
Noho Diagnostic Center, Inc. and Ustiana Shaginian
Defendant:
Kenneth Franco, Los Angeles Police Department, Doe Officers of the Los Angeles Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
