Cases 211 - 220 of 6,747
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Snider v. City of Lyndon et al
as 3:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Brandin Snider
Defendant:
City of Lyndon, City of Lyndon Police Department, Robert Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Baker v. The City of Jackson et al
as 5:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Dylon Baker
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Officer Jeff Watts, Officer Brant Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Diehl v. AutoZoners, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Diehl
Defendant:
AutoZoners, LLC and Brad Welch Jakubcani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Warick v. Tussey et al
as 7:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gary Warick and Gary D. Warick
Defendant:
George Tussey, Gerald Clark, Emmit Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
