Cases 21 - 30 of 6,891
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00519
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pollard v. Travis et al
as 5:2024cv00245
Defendant:
Judge Thomas Travis, D.P.A. Valiery Church and Probation Officer Tim Clark
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Pollard, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Allen v. Ward et al
as 3:2024cv00512
Defendant:
Pashens Fitzpatrick, Judge A. Christine Ward and Jefferson Family Court
Plaintiff:
Evangeline Antionette Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Person et al v. Boling et al
as 5:2024cv00150
Defendant:
Detective Mark Nichols, Christian County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Tyler Dearmond and others
Plaintiff:
Lashanda Person and Annastaja Hathaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Vowels v. The Hartford
as 3:2024cv00520
Defendant:
The Hartford
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fralix v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services et al
as 5:2024cv00146
Defendant:
Casey Naber, Trista Lovett, Ensite, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Fralix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
