Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00090
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Calabrese v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 3:2015cv02057
Plaintiff:
Rachel Calabrese
Defendant:
Amy Dardis, Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01998
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Marcovich et al v. City of Beaverton et al
as 3:2014cv01892
Defendant:
Beaverton School District, City of Beaverton, Ryan Garbutt and others
Plaintiff:
Emil Marcovich and Tatiana Marcovitch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anderson et al v. Beglau et al
as 6:2014cv01354
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Anderson and Jacqui Shimmin
Defendant:
Walter Beglau, Jean L Kunkle, Amy Queen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tanner v. Hightower et al
as 6:2014cv01035
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Vicki Hightower, Riverside County of California and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
