Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bryant v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid et al
as 4:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Samantha Bryant
Defendant:
Mississippi Division of Medicaid and Deborah Carter Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. John and Jane Doe Correctional Transport Employees 1-10 et al
as 3:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
Cash Charles Martin
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe Correctional Transport Employees 1-10, Prisoner Transportation Services of America, LLC and Kent D. Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Neal v. Evolve Bank & Trust et al
as 3:2012cv00232
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Neal
Defendant:
Evolve Bank & Trust and Sally Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bryant et al v. City of Ripley, Mississippi et al
as 3:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Corey Bryant , Charles Bryant and Shari Bryant
Defendant:
City of Ripley, Mississippi, South Tippah School District, Ripley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Monroe County, Mississippi
as 1:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
Roger Woods
Defendant:
Monroe County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mays v. Miller et al
as 2:2010cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Mays
Defendant:
Brian Miller, James Woods, Jr. and The City of Olive Branch, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
