Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Syville v. Department of Homeless Services et al
as 1:2017cv08888
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Syville
Defendant:
Iris Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Syville v. Project Renewal et al
as 1:2017cv08887
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Syville
Defendant:
Potts, Randle, Dean Vetake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sanossian v. Brennan et al
as 2:2016cv04697
Defendant:
John Brennan, Alphonso Daddino and Valley Stream Central High School District
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Sanossian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Samuels v. Wright et al
as 1:2015cv01442
Defendant:
Lucille Andrews, Steven Banks, Kathy Dros and others
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02191
Defendant:
Joseph Bentivegna, City of New York, Naomi Hull and others
Plaintiff:
Tamata Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray v. New York State Division of Parole et al
as 1:2013cv07090
Defendant:
Detective Paul Bostic, Alphonso Camacho, A.C.S. Agent Lastarr Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter K. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowleg v. The United States Attorney et al
as 1:2013cv05866
Plaintiff:
Harry Alphonso Bowleg
Defendant:
The United States Attorney, The Director of F.B.I., The Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
