Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Witherspoon v. Cipha Sounds et al
as 1:2015cv05066
Defendant:
Thomi Blaze, United States District Court, Josline Hernandez and others
Debtor:
D.J. Lius and Baby Swins
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Warren v. Fischl et al
as 2:2015cv02829
Defendant:
Meryle Berkowitz, ADA Mary Biunno, ADA Andrea M DiGregorio and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemp v. John Does 1-10 et al
as 1:2015cv00491
Defendant:
NYPD Officers John Does 1-10 and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kemp v. Ademola et al
as 1:2011cv01885
Plaintiff:
Shekila Kemp
Defendant:
Mary Ademola and Muhamadou B. Conten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saintvil et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv04904
Defendant:
Det. Atkins, Det. Cox, Det. Selwyn Fonro and others
Plaintiff:
Nahumy Jeanlouis, Kempes Saintvil and Mardoche Saintvil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemp v. Ademola et al
as 1:2010cv07661
Plaintiff:
Sheila N. Kemp
Defendant:
Mary Ademola, Sikou Muhamadou and B. Conteh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemp v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv06734
Plaintiff:
Robert Kemp
Defendant:
The City of New York, John Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemp v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03426
Shield No. 6100:
Detective Francis
Plaintiff:
Alan Kemp
Defendant:
Police Officer John Doe 1-6 and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
