Cases 21 - 30 of 215
Robinson v. Payne et al
as 6:2023cv01313
Plaintiff:
Jamiyah Robinson
Defendant:
Joshua Nathan Payne and City of Titusville, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ROBINSON v. YOUNG
as 4:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
JESSICA KEANNA ROBINSON
Defendant:
MORRIS A. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe v. Baker County et al
as 3:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Baker County, Baker County Corrections Management Corporation, Chair Sharon Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dorsey-Robinson v. Collins et al
as 8:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Dorsey-Robinson
Defendant:
Vanessa Collins, Jemarion Holder and Hillsborough County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Maximus, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Quinton F. Robinson
Defendant:
Maximus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
SCG Atlas Deercreek LLC vs Rorie et al
as 0:2023cv60771
Plaintiff:
SCG Atlas Deercreek LLC
Defendant:
Shelton Rorie, Jr. and Danielle Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Benefield v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Denise Benefield
Defendant:
Gregory Lee Anderson, Floyd Washington, Vincent Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
