Cases 21 - 30 of 183
Robinson v. Ott et al
as 3:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
Shantricia Robinson
Defendant:
Judge Stephen Douglass Ott, SAAG Emily Christine Long, City of Fayetteville, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Robinson v. Ott
as 3:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
Shantricia Robinson
Defendant:
Stephen Douglass Ott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valencia v. Burns et al
as 1:2021cv00075
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, OFFICER Shakera Letrese Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Richardson Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
RICHARDSON v. BURNS et al
as 1:2021cv00076
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, OFFICER Shakera Letrese Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Valencia Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robertson v. Warnock et al
as 1:2021cv01468
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Paul Guerrucci, Steven C. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard v. Robinson et al
as 1:2021cv01440
Plaintiff:
Lana Richard
Defendant:
Cathelene Robinson and Fulton County Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel et al v. Bryson et al
as 1:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Daniel and Stevee Robinson
Defendant:
Randy Brown, Mary Alston, Timothy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel et al v. Bryson et al
as 1:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Daniel and Stevee Robinson
Defendant:
Randy Brown, Mary Alston, Timothy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rufus-Aiken et al v. State Of Georgia et al
as 5:2021cv00011
Plaintiff:
Tracii Rufus-Aiken and Crystal Rufus-Robinson
Defendant:
Superior Court of Baldwin County, Judge William A. Prior, Jr., State Bar of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
