Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. The Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 2:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kenny Brown , Steve Arlinghaus , Phyllis Sparks and others
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Kentucky , The Kentucky State Board of Elections and Kentucky Legislative Research Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Robinson v. Anderson et al
as 4:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Debora Robinson
Defendant:
Barry Anderson , Grayson County Board of Education , Carolyn Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. - Americans with Disabilities Act
Kleiman v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Kleiman
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Local Union #100, IBT , Fareed Koury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springstun v. Templeman et al
as 0:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
John W. Springstun
Defendant:
Joe Templeman, Chad Bowling and Eugene Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
