Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Seaberg v. Sharp et al
as 4:2013cv02669
Plaintiff:
David Seaberg
Defendant:
Jon Sharp and Texas A&M University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisolm v. Desoto Police Department et al
as 3:2012cv05025
Plaintiff:
Bryan K Chisolm
Defendant:
Desoto Police Department , W Tillman , M Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp et al v. Covington Police Chief Richard Palmisano et al
as 3:2012cv00305
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Sharp, Lysett Rene Lerma, Danielle Lerma and others
Defendant:
Covington Police Chief Richard Palmisano, City of Covington, Louisiana, City of Covington Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith et al v. City of Midland, Texas et al
as 7:2012cv00019
Defendant:
City of Midland, Texas, Officer John Doe, Doris Schultz and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher E Smith and Judge E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharp v. U.S. Government
as 4:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
Lonell Sharp
Defendant:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holland et al v. Russell et al
as 7:2010cv00128
Defendant:
Manuel Beltran, Tony Dickie, James Dolan and others
Plaintiff:
Loretta Holland and Tracy Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sharp v. City of Fort Worth
as 4:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Lonell Sharp
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharp v. US Government
as 4:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Lonell Sharp
Defendant:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Sharp v. Devonshire Property Management
as 4:2009cv03026
Plaintiff:
Leonard Sharp
Defendant:
Devonshire Property Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
