Cases 21 - 30 of 68
BRANCH v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE et al
as 2:2015cv02848
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BRANCH
Defendant:
CITY OF EAST ORANGE, CITY OF EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, P.O. ANTALA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMER v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2015cv02284
Plaintiff:
REMOND PALMER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION , JOHN DOE 1-5 and ABC CORP. 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLIDAY v. CITY OF UNION CITY et al
as 2:2014cv08025
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN HOLIDAY
Defendant:
CITY OF UNION CITY, CITY OF UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ABC CORP. 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILES v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2014cv05492
Plaintiff:
AARON MILES
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, CITY OF JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, HENNESY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv05323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MENDEZ v. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE et al
as 2:2014cv05287
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MENDEZ
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, E. NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COIT v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. et al
as 2:2014cv05168
Plaintiff:
ERIC COIT
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., ASIF S. HUSSAIN, ABC CORP 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COPELAND v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT et al
as 2:2014cv04433
Plaintiff:
LORENZO COPELAND
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WENDELL v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv06903
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL WENDELL
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
