Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Montesa et al v. Schwartz et al
as 7:2012cv06057
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Montesa , Marie Jean Baptiste , Israel Mediua and others
Defendant:
Daniel Schwartz , Yehuda Weissmandl , Moses Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Martucci v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02796
Defendant:
P.O. Christopher Annis, City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ackerman v. Ackerman et al
as 1:2011cv00519
Plaintiff:
Annie Yau Ackerman
Defendant:
John Herbert Ackerman, Harvey I. Sladkus and Hon. Gloria Sousa-Lintner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Norman v. Martin et al
as 1:2010cv09487
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman
Defendant:
Alfred Martin, Rhoda Patrettli, Boenca Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv08113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Monroe Community Hospital et al
as 6:2009cv06250
Plaintiff:
Annie Mae Smith
Defendant:
Monroe Community Hospital and Rosemary Novick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Williams v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2008cv04010
Plaintiff:
Annis Williams
Defendant:
Michael R. Bloomberg, Robert Doar, Verna Eggleston and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
