Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
West v. Flynn et al
as 7:2016cv02994
Plaintiff:
Orane Orange Orlando West
Defendant:
Rita Flynn, Jennifer Armstrong and Paul Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sage-El v. Power et al
as 1:2015cv07417
Defendant:
C.O. Alvares, Judge M Armstrong, J Campanelli and others
Plaintiff:
Sage-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sage-El v. Power et al
as 1:2015cv09869
Plaintiff:
Sage-El
Defendant:
Power, Lam, McClean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Armstrong v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05570
Plaintiff:
Anthony Armstrong
Defendant:
NYPD Officer (P.O.) Vincent Giambalvo, Sergeant William Kong, P.O. Delare Rathour and others
NYPD:
New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gocheski et al v. Town of Rotterdam et al
as 1:2014cv01000
Plaintiff:
Phillip Gocheski and Rosemarie Gocheski
Defendant:
Town of Rotterdam , Daniel P. Ryan and Ronald R. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavre et al v. Town Of Hempstead et al
as 2:2014cv00872
Defendant:
Armstrong, Chemti, Jimmy Costa, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Deepali M. Chavre, Milind G. Chavre, Vasheta Lindsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
